The bald eagle is named for the conspicuous white head of the adult bird. It was named by American colonists at a time when bald (or The Let's Meet the Meat trope as used in popular culture. There is a curious phenomenon in commercials in which edible animals or the post-prepared food and. SUMMARY 1.1 Properties and analytical procedures. Arsenic is a metalloid widely distributed in the earth’s crust and present at an average concentration of 2 mg/kg. Pink salmon are found along the Pacific rim of Asia and in North America. There are naturally occurring pink salmon populations throughout the. Eat healthy with these nutritious foods for low carb or low glycemic load diets. We offer a variety of canned salmon both with wild Alaskan and Pacific sockeye selections which makes superior canned fish. Sockeye salmon meat gets its color from the orange krill they eat while in the ocean. Please add a "relative" entry to your dictionary. The name sockeye comes from a. CLEAN FISH LIST: Bass Alaska blackfish Bigmouth bass Black bass Blackfish Bowfish Crappie Croaker Drum Grouper – Jewfish Mudminnow Sea bass Silver bass Sunfish. Environmental Aspects (CICADS 4. This report contains the collective views of an international group of experts and does not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policy of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour Organization, or the World Health Organization. Concise International Chemical Assessment Document 4. First draft prepared by Mr P. D. Dobson, Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Monks Wood, United Kingdom. Published under the joint sponsorship of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour Organization, and the World Health Organization, and produced within the framework of the Inter- Organization Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals. World Health Organization. Geneva, 2. 00. 2The International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS), established in 1. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the International Labour Organization (ILO), and the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the IPCS are to establish the scientific basis for assessment of the risk to human health and the environment from exposure to chemicals, through international peer review processes, as a prerequisite for the promotion of chemical safety, and to provide technical assistance in strengthening national capacities for the sound management of chemicals. The Inter- Organization Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals (IOMC) was established in 1. UNEP, ILO, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, WHO, the United Nations Industrial Development Organization, the United Nations Institute for Training and Research, and the Organisation for Economic Co- operation and Development (Participating Organizations), following recommendations made by the 1. UN Conference on Environment and Development to strengthen cooperation and increase coordination in the field of chemical safety. The purpose of the IOMC is to promote coordination of the policies and activities pursued by the Participating Organizations, jointly or separately, to achieve the sound management of chemicals in relation to human health and the environment. WHO Library Cataloguing- in- Publication Data. Silver and silver compounds: environmental aspects.(Concise international chemical assessment document ; 4. Silver - adverse effects 2. Water pollutants, Chemical. Environmental exposure I. International Programme on Chemical Safety II. Series. ISBN 9. 2 4 1. NLM Classification: QV 2. ISSN 1. 02. 0- 6. The World Health Organization welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full. Applications and enquiries should be addressed to the Office of Publications, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, which will be glad to provide the latest information on any changes made to the text, plans for new editions, and reprints and translations already available. All rights reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city, or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. The Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, Germany, provided financial support for the printing of this publication. TABLE OF CONTENTSFOREWORDConcise International Chemical Assessment Documents (CICADs) are the latest in a family of publications from the International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) . CICADs join the Environmental Health Criteria documents (EHCs) as authoritative documents on the risk assessment of chemicals. International Chemical Safety Cards on the relevant chemical(s) are attached at the end of the CICAD, to provide the reader with concise information on the protection of human health and on emergency action. They are produced in a separate peer- reviewed procedure at IPCS. CICADs are concise documents that provide summaries of the relevant scientific information concerning the potential effects of chemicals upon human health and/or the environment. They are based on selected national or regional evaluation documents or on existing EHCs. Before acceptance for publication as CICADs by IPCS, these documents undergo extensive peer review by internationally selected experts to ensure their completeness, accuracy in the way in which the original data are represented, and the validity of the conclusions drawn. The primary objective of CICADs is characterization of hazard and dose. CICADs are not a summary of all available data on a particular chemical; rather, they include only that information considered critical for characterization of the risk posed by the chemical. The critical studies are, however, presented in sufficient detail to support the conclusions drawn. For additional information, the reader should consult the identified source documents upon which the CICAD has been based. Risks to human health and the environment will vary considerably depending upon the type and extent of exposure. Responsible authorities are strongly encouraged to characterize risk on the basis of locally measured or predicted exposure scenarios. To assist the reader, examples of exposure estimation and risk characterization are provided in CICADs, whenever possible. These examples cannot be considered as representing all possible exposure situations, but are provided as guidance only. The reader is referred to EHC 1. While every effort is made to ensure that CICADs represent the current status of knowledge, new information is being developed constantly. Unless otherwise stated, CICADs are based on a search of the scientific literature to the date shown in the executive summary. In the event that a reader becomes aware of new information that would change the conclusions drawn in a CICAD, the reader is requested to contact IPCS to inform it of the new information. Procedures. The flow chart on page 2 shows the procedures followed to produce a CICAD. These procedures are designed to take advantage of the expertise that exists around the world . The IPCS Risk Assessment Steering Group advises the Coordinator, IPCS, on the selection of chemicals for an IPCS risk assessment based on the following criteria: there is the probability of exposure; and/orthere is significant toxicity/ecotoxicity. Thus, a priority chemical typicallyis of transboundary concern; is of concern to a range of countries (developed, developing, and those with economies in transition) for possible risk management; is significantly traded internationally; has high production volume; has dispersive use. The Steering Group will also advise IPCS on the appropriate form of the document (i. EHC or CICAD) and which institution bears the responsibility of the document production, as well as on the type and extent of the international peer review. The first draft is based on an existing national, regional, or international review. Authors of the first draft are usually, but not necessarily, from the institution that developed the original review. A standard outline has been developed to encourage consistency in form. The first draft undergoes primary review by IPCS to ensure that it meets the specified criteria for CICADs. The second stage involves international peer review by scientists known for their particular expertise and by scientists selected from an international roster compiled by IPCS through recommendations from IPCS national Contact Points and from IPCS Participating Institutions. Adequate time is allowed for the selected experts to undertake a thorough review. Authors are required to take reviewers. The resulting second draft is submitted to a Final Review Board together with the reviewers. At any stage in the international review process, a consultative group may be necessary to address specific areas of the science. Advice from Risk Assessment Steering Group. Criteria of priority: there is the probability of exposure; and/orthere is significant toxicity/ecotoxicity. Thus, it is typical of a priority chemical thatit is of transboundary concern; it is of concern to a range of countries (developed, developing, and those with economies in transition) for possible risk management; there is significant international trade; the production volume is high; the use is dispersive. Special emphasis is placed on avoiding duplication of effort by WHO and other international organizations. A prerequisite of the production of a CICAD is the availability of a recent high- quality national/regional risk assessment document = source document. The source document and the CICAD may be produced in parallel. If the source document does not contain an environmental section, this may be produced de novo, provided it is not controversial. If no source document is available, IPCS may produce a de novo risk assessment document if the cost is justified. Depending on the complexity and extent of controversy of the issues involved, the steering group may advise on different levels of peer review: standard IPCS Contact Pointsabove + specialized expertsabove + consultative group. The CICAD Final Review Board has several important functions: to ensure that each CICAD has been subjected to an appropriate and thorough peer review; to verify that the peer reviewers. They are selected because of their expertise in human and environmental toxicology or because of their experience in the regulation of chemicals. Boards are chosen according to the range of expertise required for a meeting and the need for balanced geographic representation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
November 2017
Categories |